On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Jean-Francois Theroux wrote:

>     I use it as our gateway in our racks at the datacenter. we've got a
> few servers behind it with medium traffic. it performs well. I also
> deployed it at some clients sites. With as much as ~100 hosts behind it.
> Works well there. Got even a few sites connected with IPsec. That works
> well too. I suggest it ; )

would a 4511 be better, in terms of CPU utilization ? am planning on using
it to drive two WiFi cards and one ethernet. the 4511 will be the router
which connects two offices in the next building (via two wifi), to the
local LAN. am more concerned with performance on this one.

Regards,                           /\_/\   "All dogs go to heaven."
dinesh at alphaque dot com                (0 0)    http://www.alphaque.com/
+==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+
| for a in past present future; do                                        |
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."  |
| done; done                                                              |
+=========================================================================+