|
||||||||||
Totally agree with your comments Mike. [Comments below] > -----Original Message----- > From: EXT dash Mike dot Bradshaw at nokia dot com > [mailto:EXT dash Mike dot Bradshaw at nokia dot com] > Sent: Thursday, 8 April 2004 12:56 PM > To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > Cc: rick at scorpion dot co dot th > Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] about the load averages: 2.11, 0.07, 0.05 > > > time for my 0.02 monetary units > > > > > Hi Rick, > > > > Rick Ruggiero wrote: > > > It means, the following: > > > > > > load averages: 2.11% (Avg. process queue last minute), 0.07% (Avg. > > > process queue last 5 minutes), 0.05% (avg process queue last 15 > > > minutes). > > > > > > I don't have the m0n0wall running properly yet, but generally > > > uptime is the same on all UNIX platforms. > > > > I think it was previously established that the three numbers > > corrospond to the average percentage for the last 1, 5 and > 15 minutes > > respectivly, but I do find it somewhat illuminating that > these numbers > > are related to the process queue. > > > > As part of my job, I install monitoring software for Windows > and Unix. On the things that is normally tracked on a Unix > machine is Load Average. > > The reason I was told when starting out, was that it gives an > easy identification of "how hard the box is working". > > The figures I work with (as a rule of thumb) are; > Less than 1 : Box to big (too little work to do, Personal > workstation not running SETI etc) 1-3 : Normal/usual 4-6 : > Working hard (would benefit from increasing size of machine, > more CPU, RAM, IO etc) 6 and above : Stop being cruel Before I sent my last message I spent little time pondering "the addition of memory" (avoiding process swapping). Actually as I have not got my m0n0wall device working yet (issues with quad net interfaces) therefore, I haven't had much opportunity to verify whether there is a swap partition present or not (suspect not). If there is (and you have a large Compact Flash card), you should only receive a slight benefit in adding additional "real" memory. This benefit would be in reduced context switching, etc; hence, lower CPU load. What is the final word on that, more memory = better performance? BTW, Adam - Checked your website, love your firewall, very neat! Nice car as well. Can't get those here in Thailand. Kindest regards, Rick Ruggiero Scorpion Holding Co. Ltd. |