[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Barry Murphy" <barry at unix dot co dot nz>
 To:  "'Chris Liljenstolpe'" <cds at io dot com>, <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Zebra and m0n0wall
 Date:  Thu, 13 May 2004 09:10:17 +1200
Quagga is the new fork of zebra and this is what I'd like too, right
after atheros drivers :)

But from all the times I;ve asked in the past, they won't do it, this is
a firewall not a router.

Barry

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Liljenstolpe [mailto:cds at io dot com] 
Sent: Thursday, 13 May 2004 9:04 a.m.
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: [m0n0wall] Zebra and m0n0wall


Greetings,

	I have read through the mailing list and the discussions about
dynamic routing on a firewall being a bad thing, and in that pure role,
I agree, I don't want my firewall listening to route advertisments from
untrusted sources.  However, this is also a VPN box, and in that role,
it would be very usefull to have routes advertised through the VPN
tunnels.  So how about Zebra, and then an option to bind it only to
certain interfaces?

	Chris


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch