Thomas Hertz wrote:

>>By further masking and separating traffic, I guess one could set
>>priorities
>>for traffic (email or voip for example) to always have a slice of traffic
>>as
>>well. Neat!
>>
>>Is this what you were talking about "packages based on content"?
> 
> Yes. This is a bit more complicated though. Currently it is not possible to
> have "traffic" match more than one rule, but this can be circumvented by
> unsetting net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass. I have a slight feeling that shaping more
> than once using queues can have strange side effects though.
> 
> // Thomas Hertz 

Until such "multi-pass" shaping is implemented in the webGUI, I've 
been told there is a sort of workaround, allowing something like 
"two-pass" shaping. This is done simply by shaping on both the WAN and 
the LAN interface! Thus you could do the per-IP shaping on the LAN 
interface, and the per-protocol (port) shaping on the WAN interface!

Dunno if this will fit your respective bills though?


Adam.