[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Martin Holst" <mail at martinh dot dk>
 To:  "Adam Nellemann" <adam at nellemann dot nu>
 Cc:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] WOL client
 Date:  Wed, 26 May 2004 00:00:09 +0200
I can see - no dice here either.
I've temporarily put them on my own server:


(Not too inventive I know - but the link should work ;o)

The tools are meant for routing a WOL-packet containing the "magic"
I believe it uses UDP port 9 or 2304 as default.


-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Nellemann [mailto:adam at nellemann dot nu] 
Sent: 25. maj 2004 23:50
To: Martin Holst
Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] WOL client

Martin Holst wrote:

> Well, actually... Tools for routed WOL are available.
> I think that using one of these would be a better choice.
> Take a look at www.depicus.com. They've got a few different tools -
> freeware.
> I'm currently using the WOL GUI (358kB) and the WOL Command-line
> The depicus web page is horribly slow right now.
> If it's completely inaccessible I can drop the utils on a web server
> myself.

While I wait for their page to load...

Will these tools allow me to send a WOL packet through m0n0wall (from 
the WAN side that is), or will it still be necessary with some kind of 
WOL agent/server/whatever running on m0n0wall (or on some other box on 
the LAN side)?



P.S. That page is still loading, so perhaps it would be nice if you 
could provide alternative linkage to those WOL tools, as you mention!