[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "SysOps" <sysops at mypcbox dot com>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] ipsec and windows
 Date:  Fri, 28 May 2004 10:30:52 -0500
I my mind m0n0wall is superior to Linksys, is there anyway this
functionality could be added to m0n0wall.   I am more than positive that
there are more folks out there wanting to do this?

Joe
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mitch (WebCob)" <mitch at webcob dot com>
To: "Thomas Hertz" <term at cynisk dot net>; <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 10:16 AM
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] ipsec and windows


> Linksys can do it.
>
> They have an "advanced" checkbox on ipsec vpn tunnel config which says
"pass
> Netbios broadcasts" and when this is enabled, I can explore the other
> site...
>
> Boldly going where no weenie has gone before ;-)
>
> m/
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Hertz [mailto:term at cynisk dot net]
> > Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 8:12 AM
> > To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> > Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] ipsec and windows
> >
> >
> > Hello Nicolas,
> >
> > Theoretically, this should be possible by using a WINS server on each
side
> > of the tunnel. As of the current version of Samba, I don't think it is
> > supported to let two Samba WINS servers exchange browse lists between
each
> > other, but using Windows servers should be possible. Windows SMB
protocol
> > that is used for "browsing" shares uses broadcasts, and broadcasts are
not
> > routable across subnets.
> >
> > // Thomas Hertz
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>