|
||||||||
I my mind m0n0wall is superior to Linksys, is there anyway this functionality could be added to m0n0wall. I am more than positive that there are more folks out there wanting to do this? Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mitch (WebCob)" <mitch at webcob dot com> To: "Thomas Hertz" <term at cynisk dot net>; <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 10:16 AM Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] ipsec and windows > Linksys can do it. > > They have an "advanced" checkbox on ipsec vpn tunnel config which says "pass > Netbios broadcasts" and when this is enabled, I can explore the other > site... > > Boldly going where no weenie has gone before ;-) > > m/ > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Hertz [mailto:term at cynisk dot net] > > Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 8:12 AM > > To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] ipsec and windows > > > > > > Hello Nicolas, > > > > Theoretically, this should be possible by using a WINS server on each side > > of the tunnel. As of the current version of Samba, I don't think it is > > supported to let two Samba WINS servers exchange browse lists between each > > other, but using Windows servers should be possible. Windows SMB protocol > > that is used for "browsing" shares uses broadcasts, and broadcasts are not > > routable across subnets. > > > > // Thomas Hertz > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > |