[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Fred Wright <fw at well dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] NAT inbound
 Date:  Fri, 28 May 2004 14:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Ron Rosson wrote:
> >
> >On Thu, 27 May 2004, Ron Rosson wrote:
> >> >Ron Rosson wrote:
> >> >
[...]
> >> >And proper NAT rules? just had to ask.. It should work just fine,
> can 
> >u 
> >> >connect to it from tha lan side?
> >> 
> >>  WAN        TCP     22 (SSH)    xx.xx.xx.xx     22 (SSH)
> >> 
> >> and yep.. made sure all was good on the lan side.. 
> >
> >What column is the "WAN" in?  I have no such NAT column here (V1.0).
> 
> That is the header under interfaces.

But "interfaces" aren't listed on the NAT page, at least not here.

> >Is "xx.xx.xx.xx" the same as <internal IP> (which should be the SSH 
> >server
> >IP)?
> >
> >Is "sis1" the WAN interface?
> >
> >Is "xx.xx.xx.xx" in "xx.xx.xx.xx,22" in the log the same as <internal 
> >IP>,
> >(and not the same as the "xx.xx.xx.xx" in "xx.xx.xx.xx,19627")?
> >
> 
> I am basically redirecting all requests on port 22 on the WAN interface
> to a machine on the internal lan port 22.

Yes, I understand what you're *trying* to do.  I do the same thing here
and it works fine.  But if you're too paranoid to post real IP addresses,
and won't even answer questions about them, it's rather difficult for
anyone to see what might be going wrong.

					Fred Wright