[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  James Baber <origin at gmail dot com>
 To:  "Mitch (WebCob)" <mitch at webcob dot com>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] net4801 / WRAP performance w/m0n0wall?
 Date:  Wed, 2 Jun 2004 22:08:54 -0700
(BTW:  TTCP buflen=8192, nbuf=2048)

Hello Mitch,

Yes, device to device is fairly consistent at 89.2 Mbps.  If 32 Mbps
through the m0n0wall (net4801 or WRAP) is on the low end, are there
suggestions for "tuning"?

Thanks,
James


On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 21:50:36 -0700, Mitch (WebCob) <mitch at webcob dot com> wrote:
> 
> Just out of curiousity, did you benchmark the two test systems directly
> connected to see what the "theoretical max would have been?
> 
> I've seen systems in various states of tuning that averaged anywhere from
> 40% to 80% of "wire speed"...
> 
> m/
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Baber [mailto:origin at gmail dot com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 9:22 PM
> > To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> > Subject: [m0n0wall] net4801 / WRAP performance w/m0n0wall?
> >
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Using TTCP with the defaults, I've been averaging 32 Mbps raw
> > throughput (pass ALL through the firewall) on the Soekris net4801 and
> > the PC Engines WRAP board (both have 266 MHz).  Is this common with
> > everyone else's experiences?
> >
> > (I've got 1.2 GHz Athlons and Intel Pro/100+ Mgmt cards on both sides
> > full duplex via crossover cables.)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >
> >
> 
>