On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Adam Nellemann wrote:
> I'm currently allowing (small) ACK's to go directly to my pipe, under
> the assumption that this will amount to an "effective weight" somewhat
> higher than sending them through a weight 100 queue, but perhaps this is
i dont know if it works that way. you'd be better of creating a queue with
the highest weight and then sending the acks thru that queue.
> all wrong? (If so, what then is the idea behind rules being capable of
> going straight to a pipe?)
if you dont need queues, and just want to limit bandwidth for a host, then
just use pipes without queues. it's simpler. :)
Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven."
dinesh at alphaque dot com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/
| for a in past present future; do |
| for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do |
| echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." |
| done; done |