[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Dinesh Nair <dinesh at alphaque dot com>
 To:  Adam Nellemann <adam at nellemann dot nu>
 Cc:  Joey Morin <joeymorin at alumni dot uwaterloo dot ca>, Eric Shorkey <eshorkey at commonpointservices dot com>, <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Wondershaper
 Date:  Thu, 10 Jun 2004 02:01:45 +0800 (MYT)
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Adam Nellemann wrote:

> I'm currently allowing (small) ACK's to go directly to my pipe, under
> the assumption that this will amount to an "effective weight" somewhat
> higher than sending them through a weight 100 queue, but perhaps this is

i dont know if it works that way. you'd be better of creating a queue with
the highest weight and then sending the acks thru that queue.

> all wrong? (If so, what then is the idea behind rules being capable of
> going straight to a pipe?)

if you dont need queues, and just want to limit bandwidth for a host, then
just use pipes without queues. it's simpler. :)

Regards,                           /\_/\   "All dogs go to heaven."
dinesh at alphaque dot com                (0 0)    http://www.alphaque.com/
+==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+
| for a in past present future; do                                        |
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."  |
| done; done                                                              |
+=========================================================================+