|
||||||||||
Can you prove it by demonstrating an improvement in throughput? A few people have said it detects, but due to an initialization problem (the man page even says it's not supported yet) it doesn't work. m/ > -----Original Message----- > From: William Arbaugh [mailto:waa at cs dot umd dot edu] > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 12:42 PM > To: James Baber > Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] vpn1411/vpn1401 Do Not Work on m0n0wall > > > not exactly true...the 1411 works with the 4801 and m0n0 for me, but > there are reports that it doesn't work with the 4501 for some reason. > > > On Jun 10, 2004, at 3:31 PM, James Baber wrote: > > > Just an FYI... > > > > Unless anyone else can give solid proof, it should be noted that the > > Soekris vpn1411 and vpn1401 do not work (either on a Soekris board or > > a WRAP board) with m0n0wall (specifically FreeBSD 4.9). > > > > Order the vpn1211 or vpn1201 until it is EOL'd... > > > > Cheers, > > James Baber > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > |