[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Dinesh Nair <dinesh at alphaque dot com>
 To:  Manuel Kasper <mk at neon1 dot net>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] net4501/net4801/WRAP IPsec throughput comparison
 Date:  Sun, 13 Jun 2004 22:20:39 +0800 (MYT)
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Manuel Kasper wrote:

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> WRAP (233 MHz)
> no IPsec:		38.3 / 42.8
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> net4501
> IPsec:		16.5 / 18.5
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> net4801
> no IPsec:		25.3 / 33.6

interesting raw throughput results. the WRAP and net4801 should be using
the same CPUs (NSC SC1100), yet the WRAP perform better by at least
30%. could this be due to the hardware, since iianm, both share the sis(4)
driver under freebsd.

Regards,                           /\_/\   "All dogs go to heaven."
dinesh at alphaque dot com                (0 0)    http://www.alphaque.com/
+==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+
| for a in past present future; do                                        |
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."  |
| done; done                                                              |
+=========================================================================+