> -----Original Message-----
> From: Falcor [mailto:falcor at netassassin dot com]
> Sent: Friday, 11 June 2004 06:01
> To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: [m0n0wall] Question on Traffic Shaper and IPSEC tunnels
> I realize the IPSEC VPN tunnels can not be seen by the
> firewall engine, e.g. you can't write ACL rules. But can the
> tunnel itself (the connection to the remote VPN concentrator)
> be seen by the traffic shaper? I would like to queue and
> dedicate a good portion of my uplink to a a vpn tunnel for
> testing of some IP telephony, if I can guarantee the tunnel
> is stable (not encroached upon by other traffic on the
> firewall) it would be great.
Hhmmm... Don't know, but if the IPSEC VPN is represented in Linux by a
standard interface, such as "ppp0" in Linux, then I couldn't see why not.
The GUI wouldn't support it, tho.
Something to add to my Traffic Shaper Wish List that I recently posted on
the dev list.
Hilton Travis Phone: +61-(0)7-3343-3889
Manager, Mobile: +61 (0)419 792 394
Quark IT http://www.QuarkIT.com.au/
Quark AudioVisual http://www.QuarkAV.net/
Network Administration, SmoothWall Firewalls, NOD32 AntiVirus
Non Linear Video Editing Solutions & Digital Audio Workstations
Conference and Seminar AudioVisual Production and Recording
War doesn't determine who is right. War determines who is left.