You're right. I haven't done any testing. I just saw it detected.

I'll see what I can do on some perf numbers when I get time, but it 
will be several days at a minimum. Crazy summer already.


On Jun 10, 2004, at 3:52 PM, Mitch ((WebCob)) wrote:

> Can you prove it by demonstrating an improvement in throughput?
>
> A few people have said it detects, but due to an initialization 
> problem (the
> man page even says it's not supported yet) it doesn't work.
>
> m/
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: William Arbaugh [mailto:waa at cs dot umd dot edu]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 12:42 PM
>> To: James Baber
>> Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>> Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] vpn1411/vpn1401 Do Not Work on m0n0wall
>>
>>
>> not exactly true...the 1411 works with the 4801 and m0n0 for me, but
>> there are reports that it doesn't work with the 4501 for some reason.
>>
>>
>> On Jun 10, 2004, at 3:31 PM, James Baber wrote:
>>
>>> Just an FYI...
>>>
>>> Unless anyone else can give solid proof, it should be noted that the
>>> Soekris vpn1411 and vpn1401 do not work (either on a Soekris board or
>>> a WRAP board) with m0n0wall (specifically FreeBSD 4.9).
>>>
>>> Order the vpn1211 or vpn1201 until it is EOL'd...
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> James Baber
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>