[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Dinesh Nair <dinesh at alphaque dot com>
 To:  Jukka Salmi <jukka dash m0n0wall at 2004 dot salmi dot ch>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] net4501/net4801/WRAP IPsec throughput comparison
 Date:  Tue, 15 Jun 2004 22:59:53 +0800 (MYT)
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Jukka Salmi wrote:

> I am taken aback by the fact that you're using a vpn1411. I have some
> net4501 and some Soekris crypto accelerators (vpn1211, vpn1401 and
> vpn1411). All vpn cards are detected without problems by m0n0wall (1.0
> and 1.1b13) _except_ the vpn1411 card. Kernel output:

correct me if i am wrong, but isnt the vpn1401 a PCI board. how did it fit
into the net4501's mini-pci slot ?

(i'm off a dialup right now, so cant really check the soekris web page to
confirm what i said above)

Regards,                           /\_/\   "All dogs go to heaven."
dinesh at alphaque dot com                (0 0)    http://www.alphaque.com/
+==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+
| for a in past present future; do                                        |
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."  |
| done; done                                                              |
+=========================================================================+