[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Jukka Salmi <jukka dash m0n0wall at 2004 dot salmi dot ch>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Cc:  Dinesh Nair <dinesh at alphaque dot com>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] net4501/net4801/WRAP IPsec throughput comparison
 Date:  Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:36:54 +0200
Hi,

Dinesh Nair --> m0n0wall (2004-06-15 22:59:53 +0800):
> 
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Jukka Salmi wrote:
> 
> > I am taken aback by the fact that you're using a vpn1411. I have some
> > net4501 and some Soekris crypto accelerators (vpn1211, vpn1401 and
> > vpn1411). All vpn cards are detected without problems by m0n0wall (1.0
> > and 1.1b13) _except_ the vpn1411 card. Kernel output:
> 
> correct me if i am wrong, but isnt the vpn1401 a PCI board. how did it fit
> into the net4501's mini-pci slot ?

You're right, it's a PCI board. The net4501 has a mini-PCI _and_ a
standard PCI slot (3.3V only).


Cheers, Jukka

-- 
bashian roulette:
$ ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~