[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Dinesh Nair <dinesh at alphaque dot com>
 To:  Jukka Salmi <jukka dash m0n0wall at 2004 dot salmi dot ch>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] net4501/net4801/WRAP IPsec throughput comparison
 Date:  Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:59:21 +0800 (MYT)
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Jukka Salmi wrote:

> You're right, it's a PCI board. The net4501 has a mini-PCI _and_ a
> standard PCI slot (3.3V only).

errps, thanx. i have a net4511 and it doesnt have a PCI slot, and i sorta
ASSumed that the net4501 was a net4511 with an additional 10/100Mbps NIC.
my bad.

but this is good news. i was planning on testing out the functionality of
the vpn cards, and now the 4501/vpn1401 combination working as you've
mentioned does give hope.

Regards,                           /\_/\   "All dogs go to heaven."
dinesh at alphaque dot com                (0 0)    http://www.alphaque.com/
| for a in past present future; do                                        |
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."  |
| done; done                                                              |