[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Zadikem, Travis-taz" <tzadikem at picosecond dot com>
 To:  "Fred Wright" <fw at well dot com>, "Monowall \(E-mail\)" <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Another feature request
 Date:  Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:24:46 -0600
But why download something and massage it when you should
just be able to go to one place and get the information you need, right?
If I am at home and someone calls me with a problem with access. I should
be able to login to my m0n0wall at work and check the log right there.  I shouldn't
have to log into a second machine, check my new fancy log and then log back
into m0n0wall to fix a possible problem.  Hmm!

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Wright [mailto:fw at well dot com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:45 PM
To: Monowall (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Another feature request

On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Zadikem, Travis-taz wrote:

> Speaking of feature requests...  I have implemented m0n0wall at one
> site and will be doing the same for another, but I would really like
> to see some changes for the logs.  If you look at the logs there don't
> have headers and such.  It would be really nice to see something like
> source, destination, protocol, and a red X for not passed and a maybe
> a green circle for items that do not get blocked or something like
> that.  Otherwise, I am really liking the product and the support from
> you guys so far.

All that information is there; it's just cryptic. :-)

Fancier formatting and/or analysis could be done offline just by
downloading /etc/filter.log (and taking its "circularity" into account).

					Fred Wright

To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch