Thanks for the input. I'd like to see some throughput numbers from each of these platforms.
Although, according to the numbers Manuel posted last month the 4801 + encryption card isn't
performing as well as it should. Hopefully, someone will get to the bottom of that.
I'd really like to see some numbers on the throughput I could expect from one of those via c3 based
systems with realtek nics. At this point, I think the fact that it has a rackmount case and is only
$5 more gives the nod to the via based system in my mind.
Maybe if I end up ordering one for a client I'll do some throughput tests before I install it. I
also have a 4801 so I'll have something to compare it to. However, I don't have the encryption
accelerator card. But, that's an additional $70 which puts the price for the soekris system at quite
a bit more than the Via system.
Any other thoughts?
----- Original Message -----
From: "h underscore reuver at mantell dot xs4all dot nl (Huub" <h underscore reuver at mantell dot xs4all dot nl>
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 07:53 AM
Subject: [m0n0wall] Another Soekris Alternative Idea
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 12:57:48AM +0100, Bryan Kohlstedt wrote:
> Any thoughts on this:
> The 533mhz fanless with 3 realtek nics is the same price as a soekris
> 4801. One of the things I like about it is the rackmount case. In
> additional, the processor is faster. The only thing is I don't know how
> 533mhz vs 4801+encryption accelerator would come out. There's no
> possibility in adding on such a card with the synertrontech board.
> Any thoughts on compatibility? Any other thoughts?
I would say the processor works on a higher clock speed. It not necessarily
runs faster. A C3 is not directly comparable to Intel's or AMD's in clock
speed. The 800MHz version should run faster anyhow. At twice the clockspeed
it should be able to perform at least comparable.
With a comparable board I found the networkspeed of the VIA Rhine NIC/C3-600
a little low in combination of a Intel EEPro100 with scp. But I have not
performed elaborate tests (and the server with EEPro is a little cripled
in the harddrive configuration). Generally I achieved speeds up to 4MB/s
with a Realtek compared up to 8MB/s with an Intel.
My current opinion is the the Realtek and VIA Rhine are comparable. At least
they don't manage to use the full 100Mbit/s. With Intel-Intel communication
I did see speeds above 10MB/s (continuously with streaming data).
If you need speeds close to 100Mbit, at least chose the option with Intel
NIC's. If you can live with 10-40Mbit the Realteks might offer an
The Geode might run at equal speed with an C3-533, with hardware encryption
it might outrun the C3. I think the NS DP83816 outperforms a Realtek. The
net4501 was after all mostly limited by the PCI-bus for raw networkspeed
and the processor for encryption. But it does al at a measly 15W. Without
a harddrive ar CD-drive the power usage of the C3 might be comparable.
The VGA and I/O for keyboard and mouse might prove useless powerconsumers.
You might want to look up the comments for a Realtek network cards in
NetBSD: "This really redefines low end..."
If you look at the sources available I think both are very well documented
and supported in open source.
I'd personally compare the Geode with hardware encryption with an C3-533
with intel NIC's. Otherwise I'd purely choose the cheapest solution offering
speed for some money or if the difference is low I'd choose based on the time
Just my 2 cents.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
AventureHost.com - Worldwide Hosting - http://www.aventurehost.com
Sent from AventureMail.com, 2GB Free Email!