|
||||||||
Justin, Any luck with the new CVS? racoon just won't run regardless where I put the nat_traversal on; line >< Is NAT-T something that just isn't done often by most people? (because there aren't really any posts in the archives about this) /sylikc On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:14:19 -0500, Justin Ellison <justin at techadvise dot com> wrote: > The man page does, so I would think so. Still updating.... > > Justin > > > > On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 21:10, sylikc wrote: > > Justin, > > > > On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:21:31 -0500, Justin Ellison > > <justin at techadvise dot com> wrote: > > > If you look in your m0n0 system logs, when racoon starts, it logs the > > > FreeBSD release as well as the KAME release. The 0.3.x you refer to is > > > for the Linux port, do you know what version of KAME started supporting > > > it? > > > > > > racoon: INFO: main.c:172:main(): @(#)package version freebsd-20040408a > > > racoon: INFO: main.c:174:main(): @(#)internal version 20001216 > > > sakane at kame dot net > > > > > > It looks really old to me! FreeBSD stable now has 20040617a - but I > > > can't tell what KAME version it's using. I'm doing my first cvsup on > > > FreeBSD (kinda reminds me of emerge -uD world), so I'll try the latest > > > binary and see what happens. > > > > > > > I went to KAME's website and somehow got myself browsing into the > > http://orange.kame.net/dev/cvsweb.cgi/kame/kame/kame/racoon/samples/ > > directory. I didn't see any racoon.conf.sample-natt file... so, does > > that mean KAME's build doesn't support NAT-T? > > > > > > /sylikc > -- > > > Justin Ellison <justin at techadvise dot com> > > > |