[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  sylikc <sylikc at gmail dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall IPSec "not acceptable Agressive Mode"
 Date:  Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:08:56 -0700
Justin,

Any luck with the new CVS?  racoon just won't run regardless where I
put the nat_traversal on; line ><

Is NAT-T something that just isn't done often by most people? (because
there aren't really any posts in the archives about this)


/sylikc

On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:14:19 -0500, Justin Ellison
<justin at techadvise dot com> wrote:
> The man page does, so I would think so.  Still updating....
> 
> Justin
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 21:10, sylikc wrote:
> > Justin,
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:21:31 -0500, Justin Ellison
> > <justin at techadvise dot com> wrote:
> > > If you look in your m0n0 system logs, when racoon starts, it logs the
> > > FreeBSD release as well as the KAME release.  The 0.3.x you refer to is
> > > for the Linux port, do you know what version of KAME started supporting
> > > it?
> > >
> > > racoon: INFO: main.c:172:main(): @(#)package version freebsd-20040408a
> > > racoon: INFO: main.c:174:main(): @(#)internal version 20001216
> > > sakane at kame dot net
> > >
> > > It looks really old to me!  FreeBSD stable now has 20040617a - but I
> > > can't tell what KAME version it's using.  I'm doing my first cvsup on
> > > FreeBSD (kinda reminds me of emerge -uD world), so I'll try the latest
> > > binary and see what happens.
> > >
> >
> > I went to KAME's website and somehow got myself browsing into the
> > http://orange.kame.net/dev/cvsweb.cgi/kame/kame/kame/racoon/samples/
> > directory.  I didn't see any racoon.conf.sample-natt file... so, does
> > that mean KAME's build doesn't support NAT-T?
> >
> >
> > /sylikc
> --
> 
> 
> Justin Ellison <justin at techadvise dot com>
> 
> 
>