[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Peter Curran <peter at closeconsultants dot com>
 To:  Dinesh Nair <dinesh at alphaque dot com>, m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Patches for RADIUS accounting
 Date:  Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:38:39 +0100

The changes you have added sound pretty good to me - I will definately be 
using them.

Just a couple of detail questions...

How does the m0n0 identify itself to the RADIUS server when it sends 
accounting details (NAS-IP ADDRESS or NAS-IDENTIFIER)?

Does the AcctStop indicate a reason for the logout?

This captive portal is now beginning to look pretty good with this latest 
functionality.  For me the next priority has to be either support for 
bridging or for multiple interfaces (I don't think it matters which).  I 
recall that you previously explained that bridging was a kernel issue so 
perhaps multiple interface support would be the better approach.  Is this in 
the game plan?



This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.