[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Pat Ellison" <pat at zbit dot net>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  FW: [m0n0wall] Wireless g 54M
 Date:  Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:00:28 -0400
I move a lot of video.. The wireless works good but sometimes
I see a suttle pause from time to time. This disappears totally
on the Wired LAN.. Watching the graphs of traffic.. I really
do saturate my link.

-Pat


-----Original Message-----
From: Chet Harvey [mailto:chet at pittech dot com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 11:43 AM
To: Pat Ellison
Cc: Fred Wright; m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] Wireless g 54M


Just a side note, I am always curious as to why people think they need such
fast rates like 75 to 100mbps. Most businesses I see have 512 or 768 pipes.
Some go crazy and get 10mb pipes so unless you are moving A LOT of data
internally I just dont get it. I'd rather have range and signal strength
over
high transfer. As signal strength drops so does transfer.

just curious.

Chet Harvey
Pitbull Technologies <http://www.pittech.com/>
Protecting your Digital Assets
703.407.7311


Quoting Pat Ellison <pat at zbit dot net>:

> I have the 5G now.. I think that I can keep the 74 rate up to say. 50-60
> feet
> (It's in a closet so that limits a lot).  Through 4 walls (drywall/metal
> studs),
> I drop to 12 at about 100 feet but I don't loose carrier.
>
> Actually this "upgrade" will be a downgrade.. I'm really getting the 74mhz
> from
> the AP-500 but having problems with one last 5G PCMCIA card. but it's
> cheaper
> than buying another 5G PCMCIA card.
>
> >Umm, so which is it, A or G?  802.11g is 2.4GHz.  If it's 5GHz, it's
> 802.11a.
>
> Right it is 802.11a I'm told it's supposed to be so bad I have been VERY
> happy with it.
> Now that is my problem.... I've been so happy with this system that I
> neglected to learn
> anything about the A/B/G...etc systems. Not I'm forced to become a quick
> study..
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Wright [mailto:fw at well dot com]
> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 3:53 PM
> To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Wireless g 54M
>
>
>
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Pat Ellison wrote:
>
> > Are there any desktop PCI wireless Lan cards out there that
> > work with M0N0 that support the newer g (54meg) protocol?
>
> Not AFAIK.
>
> > Using a 5Ghz D-link AP-5000 (access point) with a PCMCIA card in the
> laptop
> > supports 74Mhz speed! really nice but...the PCMCIA card is getting
> flaky...
> > (It served me well!) need replacement but they are almost $100.00
> > I can get an access point and a card for that price.
>
> Umm, so which is it, A or G?  802.11g is 2.4GHz.  If it's 5GHz, it's
> 802.11a.
>
> Before salivating too much over G, you might want to look into:
>
> 1) How poor the range usually is for G (*much* shorter than B with the
> same equipment).
>
> 2) How the presence of a single B station causes all the Gs to drop down
> to B.  I'm not sure it even needs to be an "authorized" B station to have
> this effect.
>
> Oddly enough, I've heard that A tends to have better range than G, even
> though one would expect it to be worse, all other things being
> equal.  Maybe it's because it doesn't have to contend with Bluetooth,
> cordless phones, microwave ovens, etc. :-)
>
> 					Fred Wright
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>