[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Stefan Stolk - Dynasoft.nl" <stefan at dynasoft dot nl>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Wireless g 54M
 Date:  Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:06:47 +0200
The reason I'm using it is because I copy lots of dvd data. 100 mbps is
even a bit slow.

The company I work for is investing in wireless systems because it's
more effective. For home use I still prefer the wire.

Regards,

Stefan

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Chet Harvey [mailto:chet at pittech dot com] 
Verzonden: dinsdag 17 augustus 2004 17:43
Aan: Pat Ellison
CC: Fred Wright; m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Onderwerp: RE: [m0n0wall] Wireless g 54M

Just a side note, I am always curious as to why people think they need
such 
fast rates like 75 to 100mbps. Most businesses I see have 512 or 768
pipes. 
Some go crazy and get 10mb pipes so unless you are moving A LOT of data 
internally I just dont get it. I'd rather have range and signal strength
over 
high transfer. As signal strength drops so does transfer.

just curious. 

Chet Harvey
Pitbull Technologies <http://www.pittech.com/> 
Protecting your Digital Assets
703.407.7311


Quoting Pat Ellison <pat at zbit dot net>:

> I have the 5G now.. I think that I can keep the 74 rate up to say.
50-60
> feet
> (It's in a closet so that limits a lot).  Through 4 walls
(drywall/metal
> studs),
> I drop to 12 at about 100 feet but I don't loose carrier.
> 
> Actually this "upgrade" will be a downgrade.. I'm really getting the
74mhz
> from
> the AP-500 but having problems with one last 5G PCMCIA card. but it's
> cheaper
> than buying another 5G PCMCIA card.
> 
> >Umm, so which is it, A or G?  802.11g is 2.4GHz.  If it's 5GHz, it's
> 802.11a.
> 
> Right it is 802.11a I'm told it's supposed to be so bad I have been
VERY
> happy with it.
> Now that is my problem.... I've been so happy with this system that I
> neglected to learn
> anything about the A/B/G...etc systems. Not I'm forced to become a
quick
> study..
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Wright [mailto:fw at well dot com]
> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 3:53 PM
> To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Wireless g 54M
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Pat Ellison wrote:
> 
> > Are there any desktop PCI wireless Lan cards out there that
> > work with M0N0 that support the newer g (54meg) protocol?
> 
> Not AFAIK.
> 
> > Using a 5Ghz D-link AP-5000 (access point) with a PCMCIA card in the
> laptop
> > supports 74Mhz speed! really nice but...the PCMCIA card is getting
> flaky...
> > (It served me well!) need replacement but they are almost $100.00
> > I can get an access point and a card for that price.
> 
> Umm, so which is it, A or G?  802.11g is 2.4GHz.  If it's 5GHz, it's
> 802.11a.
> 
> Before salivating too much over G, you might want to look into:
> 
> 1) How poor the range usually is for G (*much* shorter than B with the
> same equipment).
> 
> 2) How the presence of a single B station causes all the Gs to drop
down
> to B.  I'm not sure it even needs to be an "authorized" B station to
have
> this effect.
> 
> Oddly enough, I've heard that A tends to have better range than G,
even
> though one would expect it to be worse, all other things being
> equal.  Maybe it's because it doesn't have to contend with Bluetooth,
> cordless phones, microwave ovens, etc. :-)
> 
> 					Fred Wright
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch