|
||||||||
I believe that can be done, however the connection from my office to my clients office will be via wireless, which is on the LAN side. So I was just going to ignore the WAN port alltogether. I was going to turn DHCP on for the client LAN and give clients their DHCP from the CPE Linksys. Joe On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 07:01:22 -0400, Bryan Brayton <bryan at sonicburst dot net> wrote: > Joe, > > You should be able to turn off NAT on the client routers and just use > them as straight routers, correct? I know my linksys can work as an > honest to goodness router. > > Bryan > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Lagreca [mailto:lagreca at gmail dot com] > Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 1:26 AM > To: Bryan Brayton > Cc: Fred Wright; m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > Subject: Re: Re: [m0n0wall] How to subnet OPT1 and still offer DHCP for > each subnet? > > Bryan, > > I'm sorry for the confusion, I may have thrown a few ideas around at > once. However my goal the whole time has been to try and prevent a > NAT behind another NAT. > > My m0n0 wall be doing a NAT for OPT1, and all my clients will hang off > of that. If I subnet OPT1 I believe I can prevent a NAT behind NAT > situation. > > The easiest situation would have been to assign each client an > internal IP address, and then do a NAT on that to create their own > private internal network. > > I was just afraid of any support issues with NAT behind NAT, thinking > that some things may not work correctly. If I go with subnetting, it > will eliminate any of those problems. > > I hope I make more sense now. > > BTW, I will be using Linksys WRT54G's at my main AP and also at the > client end. They are running Sveasoft firmware, which supports OSPF > routing. However that is a whole new ball game that I'm not sure I > wanna get into right now. > > On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:56:21 -0400, Bryan Brayton <bryan at sonicburst dot net> > wrote: > > Maybe I'm missing something here, but didn't Joe have client routers > in > > the mix? > > > > So without IP aliases, but with static routes on the m0n0 on the LAN > (or > > OPT or whatever) pointing at the various internal routers, wouldn't > this > > work: > > > > WAN > > | > > Joe's M0n0 box > > | > > LAN 10.1.0.1/24 > > | > > | > > |---------------------------------------- > > | | > > Client 1 Router WAN 10.1.0.2/24 Client 2 Router WAN > 10.1.0.3/24 > > | (default rt 10.1.0.1) | (default rt 10.1.0.1) > > | | > > Client 1 Router Client 2 Router > > | | > > Client 1 Router LAN 10.1.1.1/24 Client 2 Router LAN > 10.1.2.1/24 > > | | > > | | > > | | > > | | > > Client 1 LAN (default gw 10.1.1.1) Client 2 LAN (default gw > > 10.1.2.1) > > > > If dynamic routing was supported, you wouldn't have to manually enter > > the routes. You will need firewalling on the client routers to > prevent > > inter-client communication. > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong. I'm sure I'll regret that :) > > > > -Bryan > > > ________________________________ > > avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : Outbound message clean. > > Virus Database (VPS): 0434-1, 08/17/2004 > Tested on: 8/20/2004 7:01:22 AM > > > avast! - copyright (c) 2000-2004 ALWIL Software. > > |