Well call me a noob, or at least forgetful. I didn't even think of adding
static routes to the lan side of the routers. Hopefully I can be of help in
the future.


-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Wright [mailto:fw at well dot com] 
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 4:00 PM
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] I hate to sound like a noob



On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Terry Miller wrote:

> The 192.168.0.10 address is a computer (XP) and it does have a default 
> gateway of 192.168.0.12. If I move it to the second subnet it can 
> browse the internet and receive mail. The other 2 hosts are currently 
> the lan port of

If by "move" you include changing the addressing to match, then that sounds
like a firewall or NAT issue.  The defaukt outbound NAT does not apply to
OPT1.  But that's a completely separate issue from getting traffic between
LAN and OPT1.

> an old router and a wireless access point. I'm just using those for 
> testing the routing now.

They still need proper routing setups to do this.  Even the target of a ping
needs proper routing.

					Fred Wright


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch