[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "David Turner" <david dot turner at play dot com>
 To:  "Chet Harvey" <chet at pittech dot com>
 Cc:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] SNMP over IPSEC
 Date:  Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:47:34 +0100
I have no static routes at the moment. What should I add a static route
for and why? It's only SNMP that seems to be a problem. The web
interface is accessible via the tunnel and ping works fine to the LAN
interface from the other end of the tunnel. 

David Turner



-----Original Message-----
From: Chet Harvey [mailto:chet at pittech dot com] 
Sent: 01 September 2004 13:45
To: David Turner
Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] SNMP over IPSEC

did you add static routes?


Chet Harvey
Pitbull Technologies <http://www.pittech.com/> 
Protecting your Digital Assets
703.407.7311


Quoting David Turner <david dot turner at play dot com>:

> SNMP over IPSEC
> 
>  
> 
> I saw a previous thread concerning this and I think the original
poster
> may have been misunderstood.
> 
>  
> 
> I have m0n0wall 1.1 running an ipsec tunnel to an Astaro box which
seems
> to work fine. SNMP is switched on and from the LAN connected to the
> m0n0wall box I can monitor it with SNMP. What does not work is
> monitoring the same box from a machine at the other end of the tunnel.
I
> have rules set up at both ends to allow all protocols and all hosts so
> nothing should be blocking udp traffic. I also tested this between two
> m0n0wall boxes and got the same effect. 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
>  
> 
> Cheers 
> 
>  
> 
> David Turner
> 
>