[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Kevin Coleman <kevin at gabu dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] 2 adsl
 Date:  Wed, 01 Sep 2004 19:06:14 -0700
Another possible low-tech solution is to segment your network and set up 
each segment to use a different gateway and different pipe to the Internet. 
This doesn't provide dynamic balancing, but would give more effective 
bandwidth and reduce contention on the internal network. You'd have to also 
route between the segments which could reduce internal throughput to systems 
across the segment boundary.

(K)
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew J. Erickson" <aje at umn dot edu>
To: <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] 2 adsl


> This thread seems to discuss the problem. True connection load balancing 
> seems to require expensive hardware and ISP support (for BGP or OSPF), but 
> this might work...
>
> start: 
> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/isp/2004-05/0069.html
> possible solution:
> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/isp/2004-05/0081.html
>
> Andy
>
> pmok at optushome dot com dot au wrote:
>
>> Sorry dude, m0n0wall does NOT have Load Balancing capability. It'll take
>> quite a while to implement and perfect this. It may or may not be a 
>> feature
>> in the future, but not now.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>