|
||||||||||
Yes, I had to "waste" a NIC for that configuration ;-) -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Nieder, Bernd [mailto:bernd dot nieder at gilbarco dot de] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. September 2004 21:06 An: Holger Bauer; Chet Harvey Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch Betreff: AW: AW: [m0n0wall] LAN + Wireless interface only? Did you test it with 3 physically installed interfaces? Since I didn't have success trying to assign a dummy interface to LAN or WAN Regards, Bernd Nieder -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Holger Bauer [mailto:Holger dot Bauer at citec dash ag dot de] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. September 2004 15:16 An: Nieder, Bernd; Chet Harvey Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch Betreff: AW: AW: [m0n0wall] LAN + Wireless interface only? I have tried this already and I had some strange things and also still some blocks, even if allowing "any to any" on all Interfaces. I think this is because of some rules that can´t be disabled and that are not seen in the webadministration (look at http://ip-of-mono/status.php to see all rules). Maybe you could tweak somethings but you won´t get it running by setting rules in the webadministration I guess. I added a NIC to assign the wan to that isn´t used to get everything running as a filtering bridge. I don´t think that I made something wrong when I tested it. regards, Holger Bauer -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Chet Harvey [mailto:chet at pittech dot com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. September 2004 14:43 An: Nieder, Bernd Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch Betreff: Re: AW: [m0n0wall] LAN + Wireless interface only? Can you simply just use the WAN designated interface on your LAN? I have done that too. Just changed the default ruleset. That should make m0n0 happy and you too. Chet Harvey Pitbull Technologies <http://www.pittech.com/> Protecting your Digital Assets 703.407.7311 Quoting "Nieder, Bernd" <bernd dot nieder at gilbarco dot de>: > Right. This was the intended purpose of the box. I already thought about to > put in an unused interface but it's too tight in the case that I use. > > I'm afraid that I have to buy another case to add a third interface. > > Thanks, > Bernd > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Chet Harvey [mailto:chet at pittech dot com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. August 2004 20:15 > An: Nieder, Bernd > Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > Betreff: Re: [m0n0wall] LAN + Wireless interface only? > > WAN and LAN are required. What I have done for a teesting box is just assign > a an unused interface to WAN and only use LAN and OPT1(wifi) for testing. > > So if I read your email properly, you basically want m0n0 to sit between > your WLAN clients and your out-bound "router" or LAN switch. Thereby you can > shape their traffic and or apply rules and pass then thru the LAN interface > to the lan. > > Chet Harvey > Pitbull Technologies <http://www.pittech.com/> Protecting your Digital > Assets > 703.407.7311 > > > Quoting "Nieder, Bernd" <bernd dot nieder at gilbarco dot de>: > > > Hi, > > > > Is it possible to set up a configuration with LAN and WLAN interface only > > (without WAN)? I'd like to use m0n0 for a special purpose as an AP with > more > > influence on the traffic. > > > > I'm using an EPIA MII board. When I try to set up m0on0 just with the > > onboard interface installed the configuration ends up with 'sis0' as LAN > and > > 'sis1' as WAN - though I assigned 'vr0' as LAN interface and nothing for > > WAN. > > > > BTW: under normal conditions (LAN+WAN interface installed) the onboard NIC > > works pretty fine as 'vr0'. > > > > Any hints? > > > > Thanks, > > Bernd > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch ____________ Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit ____________ Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit |