[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Andrew Frazer" <andrew dot frazer at sententia dot co dot nz>
 To:  "'Mitch \(WebCob\)'" <mitch at webcob dot com>, <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Wanted: Contract programmer to develop HTTPS for captive portal.
 Date:  Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:24:21 +1200
Thanks for that.. A little more playing and I found that there was a way of
doing this. :-).  In my case the number of sites that I want to allow
through a very minimal.. ( less than 10, and so doing a manual resolution
won't be a big problem! )



-----Original Message-----
From: Mitch (WebCob) [mailto:mitch at webcob dot com] 
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 4:50 PM
To: Andrew Frazer; m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] Wanted: Contract programmer to develop HTTPS for
captive portal.

> There is one other add-on that would be very handy.. ( or maybe I
> missed the
> point ).. I would like to be able to set up a 'walled' garden.. That is to
> say have a small number of web sites that an un-authenticated user can
> access..   and example of this, would be if monowall was being used in a
> hotel,  the guest could access a web site with the hotel's menu..
>

I'm not sure, but I think this part already exists, almost - but by way of
allowable IP addresses instead of allowable names... a little more work to
maintain the way it is (unless you control all the websites you are allowing
of course)...

That part should be quite easy.

m/