[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "James W. McKeand" <james at mckeand dot biz>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall embedded with RADIUS Server
 Date:  Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:28:53 -0400
Could the same user list that is used for the PPTP VPN be used for this

Should the number of users on the PPTP list limited in the same manner (and
for the same reason)?

Just food for thought...

James W. McKeand

-----Original Message-----
From: Dinesh Nair [mailto:dinesh at alphaque dot com] 
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 12:19 AM
To: Mitch (WebCob)
Cc: Bernie Kucharski; m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall embedded with RADIUS Server

On 11/09/2004 09:17 Mitch (WebCob) said the following:
> Maybe you want to consider some sort of lighter weight access control 
> system and a modification to dinesh's captive portal concept to use 
> it? Just a thought.

one idea i've been mulling around with is to have a simple user/password
database on the m0n0wal for captive portal users to authenticate against.
if this is implemented, i'd probably limit the number of users to a small
number like 16 or 32 to begin with. anything more than that, and it may make
more sense to go the RADIUS route.

Regards,                           /\_/\   "All dogs go to heaven."
dinesh at alphaque dot com                (0 0)    http://www.alphaque.com/
| for a in past present future; do                                        |
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."  |
| done; done                                                              |

To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch