[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "C. Falconer" <cfalconer at avonside dot school dot nz>
 To:  "'James W. McKeand'" <james at mckeand dot biz>, m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall problems SOLVED! And some observations.
 Date:  Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:44:19 +1200
Why?  Seems a logical inconsistancy to allow aliases in some places and deny
them in others (jeez even my english is starting to sound like
firewall-speak)


-----Original Message-----
From: James W. McKeand [mailto:james at mckeand dot biz] 
Sent: Tuesday, 14 September 2004 2:16 a.m.
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall problems SOLVED! And some observations.


The setting for remote syslog server states "IP address of remote syslog
server." That and field does not have a light blue background ;-)
 
AFAIK, aliases work for FW rules, NAT and Traffic Shaper *only*.

_________________________________
James W. McKeand