I think he's saying that he's using m0n0 1.1 with both attempts.  It 
works with the .iso and not the .img.  As far as I know there shouldn't 
be any differences between the two?  Only that the CDROM ISO was made 
differently (physically) then the img.

Correct me if I'm wrong?

-Matt

C. Falconer wrote:

>Just some guesses...
>
>Maybe there are some differences in the drivers for the realteks in the
>different versions...  m0n0 1.1 is based on freeBSD4.10 and 1.0 was based on
>4.9
>
>I've got a bunch of realtek nics here in thin clients... Theres three
>different subversions and some work right with PXEs, some don't without
>tweaking.  Maybe somehting like that.
>
>In short - realtek is cheap, and you get what you pay for.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: david me [mailto:david19702004 at yahoo dot com] 
>Sent: Tuesday, 14 September 2004 11:54 a.m.
>To: C. Falconer
>Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] Is it possible that...
>
>
>I see your point that I agree (most of time I use 3com/SMC/Intel). But my
>question was based on why the 2 NIC Realtek are working with M0n0 1.1 CDROM
>version, but not working with M0n0 1.1 Generic-PC (CF/HDD) version... That's
>all!
>
>
>
>--- "C. Falconer" <cfalconer at avonside dot school dot nz>
>wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Flip the realteks into someone (elses) windows box
>>and put some decent cards
>>in the firewall.  3com are great, so is SMC or any
>>other big name.
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: david me [mailto:david19702004 at yahoo dot com]
>>Sent: Monday, 13 September 2004 9:39 p.m.
>>To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>>Subject: [m0n0wall] Is it possible that...
>>
>>
>>...m0n0 1.1cdrom version is "different" from m0n0
>>1.1
>>cf/ide version ?
>>
>>My configuration:
>>Intel Celeron 400 on 440LX chipset M/B
>>64MB
>>Floppy
>>CDROM 40x
>>HDD 2.5
>>2 x Realtek 8139 PCI
>>
>>This morning I toke 7 hours trying to install the
>>m0n0
>>1.1 CF/HDD version on the above configuration,
>>giving
>>up because, no matter which network PCI card I've
>>used, always the second one (WAN) was UP but not
>>"reacting"
>>I tried to work around the bios/pci slot/irq etc,
>>but
>>always on m0n0, the WAN card was not "responding" to
>>clients requests. All seems OK, both interfaces was
>>UP
>>and running, but not able also to ping an external
>>address though the DIAGNOSTICS/PING web page
>>(request
>>expired)
>>
>>** note that I'm already running other m0n0
>>firewalls,
>>and I've the confidence to setup them up properly,
>>including DNS addresses.
>>
>>I tried changing so many ethernet card, but no
>>way...
>>
>>After give up (7 hours), I decided to remove the HDD
>>and give a try to the cdrom version.
>>Do you believe me that the same configuration (saved
>>from the gui interface as xml file) under cdrom
>>version is working with ANY card ?
>>
>>How could it be possible that under same PC
>>configuration (same network cards, same cables, same configuration 
>>.xml
>>file,etc) the CF/HD version was not working, while
>>the CDROM yes ?
>>
>>Where did I mistake >
>>
>>
>>		
>>_______________________________
>>Do you Yahoo!?
>>Shop for Back-to-School deals on Yahoo! Shopping. 
>>http://shopping.yahoo.com/backtoschool
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
>
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>>For additional commands, e-mail:
>>m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>		
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
>http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>
>!DSPAM:4146420c214117498220376!
>  
>