Correct.
Both (CDROM & generic-PC-CF/HD) are 1.1
My point was not reliability about REALTEK, but HOW
COULD IT POSSIBLE THAT same NIC is working with CDROM
and not with generic-PC-CF/HD, IF kernel is same!
Everybody knows that Realtek are what you pay for...

--- Matt Juszczak <matt at atopia dot net> wrote:

> I think he's saying that he's using m0n0 1.1 with
> both attempts.  It 
> works with the .iso and not the .img.  As far as I
> know there shouldn't 
> be any differences between the two?  Only that the
> CDROM ISO was made 
> differently (physically) then the img.
> 
> Correct me if I'm wrong?
> 
> -Matt
> 
> C. Falconer wrote:
> 
> >Just some guesses...
> >
> >Maybe there are some differences in the drivers for
> the realteks in the
> >different versions...  m0n0 1.1 is based on
> freeBSD4.10 and 1.0 was based on
> >4.9
> >
> >I've got a bunch of realtek nics here in thin
> clients... Theres three
> >different subversions and some work right with
> PXEs, some don't without
> >tweaking.  Maybe somehting like that.
> >
> >In short - realtek is cheap, and you get what you
> pay for.
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: david me [mailto:david19702004 at yahoo dot com] 
> >Sent: Tuesday, 14 September 2004 11:54 a.m.
> >To: C. Falconer
> >Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] Is it possible that...
> >
> >
> >I see your point that I agree (most of time I use
> 3com/SMC/Intel). But my
> >question was based on why the 2 NIC Realtek are
> working with M0n0 1.1 CDROM
> >version, but not working with M0n0 1.1 Generic-PC
> (CF/HDD) version... That's
> >all!
> >
> >
> >
> >--- "C. Falconer" <cfalconer at avonside dot school dot nz>
> >wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Flip the realteks into someone (elses) windows box
> >>and put some decent cards
> >>in the firewall.  3com are great, so is SMC or any
> >>other big name.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: david me [mailto:david19702004 at yahoo dot com]
> >>Sent: Monday, 13 September 2004 9:39 p.m.
> >>To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >>Subject: [m0n0wall] Is it possible that...
> >>
> >>
> >>...m0n0 1.1cdrom version is "different" from m0n0
> >>1.1
> >>cf/ide version ?
> >>
> >>My configuration:
> >>Intel Celeron 400 on 440LX chipset M/B
> >>64MB
> >>Floppy
> >>CDROM 40x
> >>HDD 2.5
> >>2 x Realtek 8139 PCI
> >>
> >>This morning I toke 7 hours trying to install the
> >>m0n0
> >>1.1 CF/HDD version on the above configuration,
> >>giving
> >>up because, no matter which network PCI card I've
> >>used, always the second one (WAN) was UP but not
> >>"reacting"
> >>I tried to work around the bios/pci slot/irq etc,
> >>but
> >>always on m0n0, the WAN card was not "responding"
> to
> >>clients requests. All seems OK, both interfaces
> was
> >>UP
> >>and running, but not able also to ping an external
> >>address though the DIAGNOSTICS/PING web page
> >>(request
> >>expired)
> >>
> >>** note that I'm already running other m0n0
> >>firewalls,
> >>and I've the confidence to setup them up properly,
> >>including DNS addresses.
> >>
> >>I tried changing so many ethernet card, but no
> >>way...
> >>
> >>After give up (7 hours), I decided to remove the
> HDD
> >>and give a try to the cdrom version.
> >>Do you believe me that the same configuration
> (saved
> >>from the gui interface as xml file) under cdrom
> >>version is working with ANY card ?
> >>
> >>How could it be possible that under same PC
> >>configuration (same network cards, same cables,
> same configuration 
> >>.xml
> >>file,etc) the CF/HD version was not working, while
> >>the CDROM yes ?
> >>
> >>Where did I mistake >
> >>
> >>
> >>		
> >>_______________________________
> >>Do you Yahoo!?
> >>Shop for Back-to-School deals on Yahoo! Shopping. 
> >>http://shopping.yahoo.com/backtoschool
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  
> >
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >>For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >		
> >__________________________________
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
> >http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> >
> >
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >For additional commands, e-mail:
> m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >
> >
> >!DSPAM:4146420c214117498220376!
> >  
> >
> 
> 



		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo