[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Dinesh Nair <dinesh at alphaque dot com>
 To:  "Mitch (WebCob)" <mitch at webcob dot com>
 Cc:  Michael Monaghan <mmonaghan at gmail dot com>, sylikc <sylikc at gmail dot com>, Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com>, m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] External Authentication
 Date:  Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:12:54 +0800
On 22/09/2004 14:54 Mitch (WebCob) said the following:
> Does it have to work this way? Could it be modified to create allow rules
> only based on IP? Could be a checkbox (default to off of course for original
> behaviour)...

it could, which is what i'm investigating now. i want to see what other 
implications removing that check would have. also even if it is doable, i 
won't be putting it into the official distro as it would defeat the purpose 
of a captive portal.

-- 
Regards,                           /\_/\   "All dogs go to heaven."
dinesh at alphaque dot com                (0 0)    http://www.alphaque.com/
+==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+
| for a in past present future; do                                        |
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."  |
| done; done                                                              |
+=========================================================================+