[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Axel Eble <axel dot eble at gmail dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Pay for a new function?
 Date:  Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:19:29 +0200
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:08:49 -0400, Jim Gifford <baadpuppy at gmail dot com> wrote:
> I think the general consensus is that separate ip subnets (broadcast
> domains) should get separate ethernet collision domains.  Whether this
> is done with multiple physical interfaces or by using VLANs is
> immaterial.  Having this separation is more secure than not having it.

As long as you know the risks - maybe. I've seen too many switches
pass packets across VLAN borders.

> That's just my opinion.
> 
> I've been communicating with Dennis off-list about the problem he is
> trying to solve and trying to come up with a different way of solving
> it instead of using the "multinetting" solution.

Thanks - that's the spirit!

> jim

Axel


-- 

VoIP: 8002887 at sipgate dot de * cell: +49.178.285-3265