Ok.. That's the answer I was looking for. I knew there was probably a
good reason. Thanks. I especially liked "Coddling the Brain-Dead,
Penalizing the Conscientious"  :)

But do people still use "out of office replies" in this day and age of
spam?  Sheesh. So much wasted traffic...




gramels wrote:
> I am strictly against reply-to-list as a default, otherwise the list
> would receive all stupid out of office replies...
> 
> please read also http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> 
> 
> On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 12:47:41 -0400, William Arlofski
> <waa dash m0n0wall at revpol dot com> wrote:
> 
>>
>>Would it be possible for the mailing list owner to switch the reply-to
>>and CC fields on email sent from the list.
>>
>>Currently when clicking "reply" to an email on the list, the reply goes
>>to the sender, rather than to the list. Often, a reply ends up being
>>sent only to the user and because of this, the problem is solved, but
>>the answer never makes it to the list leaving dead ends for future
>>m0n0wall users seeking answers to questions.
>>
>>I think reply-to should be the m0n0wall list, and CC should be the
>>original sender. Am I off base on this line of thinking?
>>
>>Thanks for any input.
>>
>>Bill Arlofski
>>waa dash m0n0wall at revpol dot com