on 10-10-2004 13:29 sylikc wrote:
> Wow, this looks like a solo thread ;)
> It's strange that you are having issues with NAT-T. Quite awhile
> back, I posted regarding how NAT-T was giving me trouble because SA
> negotiation with SoftremoteLT and m0n0 were timing out. However,
> in the latest reincarnation of m0n0 (1.2b1), I decided to give it a
> shot after reading another post saying it works out just fine. And
> low and behold, I can do IPSec through my m0n0 doing NAT. I'm not
> familiar with the setkey utility so I can't verify whether that is
> good or not.
Ok - could you tell me where you setup varies from the one described here:
Cause I followed that to the letter.
Klavs Klavsen, GSEC - kl at vsen dot dk - http://www.vsen.dk
PGP: 7E063C62/2873 188C 968E 600D D8F8 B8DA 3D3A 0B79 7E06 3C62
"Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly."