|
||||||||
Hello, I've been using m0n0 for a month and have thought about a few improvements that would makeit easier to manage. 1.- Aliases are quite usefull but, why don't have user difined aliases for ports (HTTP -> TCP 80, VNC -> TCP 5900, DNS -> UDP/TCP 53 ...)? 2.- Sometimes you need to give access to some services that are related all together so you must define a rule for each one. A good solution would be that you could define groups of services in order to reduce the number and complexity of the rules. For instance, I always use to give access to mail Internet services (HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, telnet, dns ...) to my LAN; this could be represented in only one rule if you can group all these services together. Another example are services that use several ports like VNC (5800,5900), DNS (53 TCP/UDP), PCAW, etc. 3.- The IP addess of the interface generally is related with the origin addresses of the packets it receives, with some exceptions like WAN or complex network achitectures. So it would also be useful that a rule could affect to all interfaces (making again the definition of rules easier) by introducing an "any" to the interface selection. 4.- In my network there are subnetworks that are not managed by myself so I cannot redefine routings on them. I would like to be able to access these networks from WAN subnet, so I need to make NAT to the LAN interface address. But I cannot do NAT into the LAN side. Could it be possible in next versions? Please gimme some comments about this, thank you. Germán |